Industry

AI-generated text

OpenAI to Drop NDAs and Push Community Input on 'Compute Campuses'

OpenAI announced it will avoid nondisclosure agreements in data center agreements and seek to ensure facilities do not raise local energy costs, rebranding sites as “compute campuses” and promoting community engagement.

OpenAI to Drop NDAs and Push Community Input on 'Compute Campuses'

OpenAI said on Thursday it will avoid nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) in deals related to data centers and will take steps to ensure that such facilities do not increase energy costs for local residents. The company framed these policies as part of efforts to make AI infrastructure expansion more acceptable to surrounding communities.

Rebranding as "compute campuses" and seeking more local input

As part of the shift in tone, OpenAI has started referring to data centers as "compute campuses" and said it wants to incorporate more community feedback into planning and operations. The change has also helped create demand for a new role in the labor market — the "data-center liaison" — tasked with interacting between companies and local stakeholders.

Skepticism from AI safety advocates

AI safety advocates have expressed skepticism about the outreach. Their doubts stem from broader mistrust of tech industry practices and questions over how transparent and enforceable OpenAI’s commitments will be in practice.

Rising public resistance internationally

The announcement comes amid growing backlash against data center construction worldwide. In the United States, voters this week rejected proposals related to data center construction in nearly every instance where the issue appeared on the ballot. Protests against data centers are also planned for this weekend in Australia and in several European countries. These developments underscore mounting local concerns, particularly around energy usage and community impacts.

Why this matters

OpenAI’s move reflects a broader attempt within the AI industry to reduce public opposition by changing language, increasing community engagement, and offering operational assurances. Whether these measures will be sufficient to restore public trust depends on the specifics of implementation and the demonstrated local impacts.

(Reporting note: Brendan Ruberry is credited as the original brief’s author.)