Business

California jury throws out Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI and Sam Altman

A California jury dismissed Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman, ruling the claim was filed after the statute of limitations had expired.

California jury throws out Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI and Sam Altman

A California jury unanimously dismissed Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman, finding that Musk filed the claim after the statute of limitations had expired.

Background of the case

Elon Musk, who was an early investor in OpenAI, alleged in the suit that the organization betrayed its original mission. He argued that founders including Sam Altman and Greg Brockman abandoned their commitment to develop artificial general intelligence "for the benefit of humanity" when the organization shifted from a nonprofit model toward profit-driven operations.

Court proceedings

Jurors spent roughly three weeks reviewing internal communications and hearing witness testimony. In his testimony, Sam Altman said that Musk not only supported the idea of OpenAI moving toward a profit-oriented model but also sought to exert long-term control over the organization.

Relevant timeline and facts

OpenAI launched as a nonprofit in 2015 and shifted to a more profit-oriented structure in 2019 after Musk had left the organization. In 2023, OpenAI received a large, $10 billion investment from Microsoft, a development that drew strong objections from Musk. Musk subsequently founded his own, far less popular AI venture under the name xAI.

Prior 2024 lawsuit

Musk had previously sued OpenAI in 2024 on similar grounds. That earlier case did not progress far: OpenAI disclosed several email exchanges between its leadership and Musk, which showed that in the organization’s early years Musk himself had pushed for attracting investment and pursuing greater profitability. Musk later withdrew the 2024 lawsuit at the last moment without explanation.

Why the decision matters

Legally, the jury’s decision closes this particular claim because the court dismissed it on statute-of-limitations grounds. The dispute highlights broader questions about the goals, funding and governance of AI development, especially when large commercial investments and corporate strategies reshape initiatives that began as nonprofit efforts.

The jury delivered its verdict on Monday after about two hours of deliberation.